Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...
Chen, Z, Li, H and Wong, C T C (2000) Environmental Management of Urban Construction Projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 320–4.
Crowley, L G (2000) Friedman and Gates—Another Look. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 306–12.
Drexler, J A and Larson, E W (2000) Partnering: Why Project Owner-Contractor Relationships Change. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 293–7.
Dunston, P S, Savage, B M and Mannering, F L (2000) Weekend Closure for Construction of Asphalt Overlay on Urban Highway. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 313–9.
Hiyassat, M A S (2000) Modification of Minimum Moment Approach in Resource Leveling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 278–84.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords:
- ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(278)
- Abstract:
This paper proposes a modification to the minimum moment approach that is used for resource leveling as presented by Harris and based upon the critical path method. The proposed and the traditional methods were developed with the assumption of no activity splitting and a fixed project duration with unlimited availability of resources. The difference between these methods is in the criteria of selecting the activity that has to be shifted from its original position to a better position. This is judged by the change in the statical moment of the resource histogram before and after such movement. In the proposed method, and for the activities that lie at the same sequence step, the activity that is to be shifted first is selected based upon both the value of its free float (S) and the value of its resource rate (R). In this way, the calculation of the improvement factor is needed only to determine the extent to which an activity is to be shifted. On the other hand, using the traditional method, the activity with the maximum improvement factor found for each possible day of shifting is selected first. The process is then repeated for all remaining activities using the updated histogram resulting from the shifted activity. The proposed method significantly reduces the calculations so that the number of iterations in each sequence step is equal to the number of its noncritical activities (n) as compared to (n!) in the traditional method. In addition, the calculation process using the proposed method is easier—especially for manual computations—than the traditional one. The results were insignificantly different, and in many cases they were identical. In this paper, the traditional and the proposed methods will be presented along with an example problem that was solved using the two methods. It should be noted that neither of the two methods provides the true minimum moment.
Javid, M and Seneviratne, P N (2000) Investment Risk Analysis in Airport Parking Facility Development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 298–305.
Koo, B and Fischer, M (2000) Feasibility Study of 4D CAD in Commercial Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 251–60.
Maio, C, Schexnayder, C, Knutson, K and Weber, S (2000) Probability Distribution Functions for Construction Simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 285–92.
Molenaar, K, Washington, S and Diekmann, J (2000) Structural Equation Model of Construction Contract Dispute Potential. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 268–77.
Thomas, H R (2000) Schedule Acceleration, Work Flow, and Labor Productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(04), 261–7.